I don`t know how this will play out in court, but I want you to understand that you`re definitely taking a risk if you already have an FRT-15 trigger or are considering buying one. Now, the courts could decide that the FRT-15 trigger could be completely legal, but if they decide that the FRT-15 trigger is indeed illegal, the ATF could arrest you and you could be charged with a crime in federal court. The ATF made the revelation Thursday in an open letter to state-licensed arms dealers. In the letter, the office says some of these triggers are “firearms” and “machine guns” under the Gun Control Act. These are triggers manufactured by Rare Breed Triggers in Florida. People who can legally possess bump stock in California include: According to Criminal Code 32900 PC, it is illegal in California to use, possess, manufacture or give away bump stocks. Also known as multiburst trigger activators, bump stocks are weapon accessories that increase the speed at which semi-automatic rifles fire. Therefore, a shooter with a standard trigger pulls the trigger to fire, the trigger is reset via spring tension, and then the trigger is pulled again to pull a second turn. A function (in this case, just a “movement”) gives a bullet, NOT a machine gun. This means that a normal gun owner cannot own a machine gun unless it was manufactured before 1986.
As an exception to this law, people who have their own FFL and who are SOTs (even outside their own home) can legally own and even manufacture machine guns manufactured today. In an initial order, the ATF claimed that the force reset triggers are machine guns. The ATF decided at its sole discretion that the FRT-15 was a machine gun. But Rare Breed Triggers claims that the FRT-15 is a completely legal semi-automatic trigger because the trigger has to be pulled for each bullet, so it`s still semi-automatic. If you want to see the history of legal documents surrounding this ongoing battle, please check them out here. Specifically, 32900 CP states: “Except as provided in Chapter 1 (beginning with Section 17700) of Section 2 of Title 2, any person in that State who imports, holds for sale, offers for sale or exhibits in the State, or who gives, lends or possesses a multiburst trigger activator, shall be liable to imprisonment in a county jail for a term not exceeding one year or to imprisonment under subdivision (h) of section 1170. Excellent article Ryan, and very informative. I just purchased a hard reset trigger. The WO trigger, to be exact. The ability of the ATF to change the definition at any time is worrisome. And I think they`re likely to get away with it, which makes gun owners and anyone who wants to become gun owners more timid.
This is essentially alarmist. If they win the case, anyone who bought one would be a criminal by “definition” if they didn`t destroy or put that trigger back on. RIP all with a one-step light trigger, then the ATF`s decision comes just two weeks after 20 U.S. senators called the agency to the mat for enforcing “secret policies” regarding forced reset triggers. A March 11 letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and ATF acting director Marvin Richardson describes what senators see as an abuse of the ATF`s powers, accusing the agency of deliberately hiding internal “guidelines” documents from U.S. gun owners and the gun industry. The best defense against charges of tampering with an illegal shock stick depends on the specific facts of the case. What I can do is give you information about the FRT-15 trigger, the differences between a semi-automatic pistol and an automatic weapon, and my opinion on whether you should buy the FRT trigger. Looks like a force reset trigger, so exactly an FRT-15. A new trigger hits the market. Your website appears to have shipped to California after playing with the checkout menu. I`m so tempted to try.
This video below provides an excellent description of the function of a standard AR-15 trigger compared to the rare breed trigger from the 50-second mark: “RBT does not agree with any conclusion suggesting that the FRT-15 can pull more than one turn through a single trigger function,” wrote Kevin Maxwell. General counsel for Rare Breed, in a letter to Craig Saier in August. Special Representative of the Tampa Field Division. “It`s not just my opinion. Prior to the manufacture of the first FRT-15, the design was extensively reviewed by retired Special Constable Kevin McCann, Esquire, and former ATF Special Agent, Program Manager, and Chief Firearms Technology Instructor, Daniel G. O`Kelly. The conclusion of this review concluded that the FRT-15 is not a machine gun. To be clear, all triggers must reset under spring pressure. In this way, a trigger can finally be applied successively.
In this article, we will explore the legal issues surrounding the FRT, the ATF`s determination, and whether I think it is correct. Rare Breed Triggers, LLC, an Orlando-based trigger manufacturer, is in dispute with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) over the legal determination of its trigger. “Any weapon that fires, is designed to fire, or can be easily recovered to automatically fire more than one shot, without manual reloading, through a single trigger function.” 1 2 According to 26 USC 5845(b): “A machine gun is a weapon that automatically fires more than one shot by a single trigger function, is designed to fire, or can be easily recovered to fire without manual reloading. This term also includes the frame or receiver of such a weapon, any part exclusively and exclusively designed and intended, or any combination of parts designed and intended for the conversion of a weapon into a machine gun, and any combination of parts from which a machine gun may be assembled when such parts are in the possession or control of a person. California Penal Code 32900 makes it illegal to possess, manufacture, import, or sell a stock bump in California.
